I'm hoping someone can answer this for me in plain english at some point, I just don't understand why everyone in the Bitcoin core developement team wouldn't want something that is ALready scaled 3 times larger than a 2mb block size upgrade.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/segwit2x-could-be-in-trouble-as-bitwala-becomes-first-signatory-to-renege-on-new-york-agreement
The 8mb that BCC provides should solve this scalability problem for a good amount of time I feel like.
I understand that BCC is a copy of bitcoin and thus less valuable for now, but my question is that if Bitcoin will copy it'self anyway and people will start using the segwit2x Bitcoin with increased block size, isn't that the same thing just less good? Or am I crazy?
Segwit is supposively illegal as well because it will make bitcoin completely anaonmous, no signiture but don't quote me on that. Plus the various "conspiraacy theories about the core developement team having the power to change Bitcoin.
Who knows.
I do know one company has pulled out of the Segwit2x agreement and quite frankly I hope more follow because yes I am not yet a programmer I don't know what's best for bitcoin, but to me... this doesn't sound like it.
This news article just popped up as I was writing this as well:
