<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 20:17:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/@bitreverse/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Generative art: questioning the status quo - we should do better]]></title><description><![CDATA[Brief intro The goal of this article is to summarize my thoughts on the generative art landscape from a platforms point of view. Mainly trying to answer the question, where as a platform we can do better]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/generative/@bitreverse/generative-art-questioning-the-status-quo-we-should-do-better</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/generative/@bitreverse/generative-art-questioning-the-status-quo-we-should-do-better</guid><category><![CDATA[generative]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[bitreverse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:39:21 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/2dk2RRM2dZ8gKjXsrozapsD83FxL3Xbyyi5LFttAhrXxr16mCe4arfLH9tgSXdt8BEvFddP2DvsdJbEeT8JiEn4ybRAHjz8UhkNoyChChwStNoWyhLVGg4uuZCnZwsRs5CWBk9T8cYDBcuVWzHo5ig6ALJN5fCxogDkq4e1xTQ?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>