<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:12:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/@carlkruse/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[The SEC moves against Veritaseum (VERI)]]></title><description><![CDATA[In the latest SEC action against a crytpo company's ICO, the SEC has shut down Veritaseum (VERI) and forced the company and its founders to pay about $9.4 million in disgorgement and fines. This article]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/sec/@carlkruse/the-sec-moves-against-veritaseum-veri</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/sec/@carlkruse/the-sec-moves-against-veritaseum-veri</guid><category><![CDATA[sec]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[carlkruse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 08:28:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EOS vs The SEC:  Commentary on The B1 Settlement]]></title><description><![CDATA[Q. With the recent agreement between the SEC and Block.One can we now say EOS is not a security as some commentators are saying? A. No. The SEC considers the original B1 ERC-20 tokens to be unregistered]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/eos/@carlkruse/eos-vs-the-sec-commentary-on-the-b1-settlement</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/eos/@carlkruse/eos-vs-the-sec-commentary-on-the-b1-settlement</guid><category><![CDATA[eos]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[carlkruse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:22:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>