PART TWO:

Ancient Languages and the connection to English

From a linguistic perspective, there are numerous etymological and striking similarities to different languages across the world; however, there are also many hidden notions of the English language itself, and how this plays a vital role in our society.

In regards to our “modern day” English, it has evolved into something completely infiltrated, yet if we decipher the origins behind words, we can begin to understand exactly how our language was infiltrated, how the code to the English language can be deciphered, and furthermore utilized by the elite to control specific agendas. This is done primarily though organized religion, and falsifying information for the general public to then consume.

A brief example of the similarities between English and ancient languages can be found in the only non-Indo-European language within the European continent. Basque (also known as Euskara) is the only pre-Indo-European language within the continent of Europe that still exists today, and its origins are completely unknown.

For example, the language Euskara (spoken by the Basque people in the Basque Country – a beautiful autonomous region between the north east corner of Spain and France) has been studied by many scholars who have concluded that Euskara (Basque) was the original language of the creator, prior to the Tower of Babel and the splitting of the human tongues.

This language was spoken in pre-Christian times on our planet, yet today only a very small portion of the world’s population speaks it (roughly 800,000 native speakers).

In relation to the Tower of Babel story, In Genesis 11:7 it states, “Come, let us confuse their language that they may no longer understand one another’s speech”.

Yet, there are still traces of words within the English language that derive directly from the Basques. For example, Amen, Jesus Christ, Jerusalem, Adam, Tigris, Cain, Abel, and Enoch can all be analyzed and directly related back to the Basque language.

In linguistics, the highly regarded formula for analyzing words or sentences is VCV – vowel, consonant, vowel. If we take a quick glimpse into the language of Euskara, spoken by the Basque’s, we can see how English, although still quite corrupt, has retained some of its initial origin as the language spoken by the creator. By using the VCV technique and correlating it between the language of the Basque people and English, it becomes quite clear.

The word Amen, can be subdivided quite simply.

Ame Ametsetsi
VCV VCV to idealize

En Ene
VC VCV exclamation

The exclamation of idealization.

Along with this, the word Euskara can also be subdivided using the VCV method quite clearly.

Eu euki to preserve
Us usaiako traditional
Ke akela goddess
Era erabildura usage/speech

We preserve the traditional speech of the Goddess

It should also be noted that in the first quarter of the 1800’s, the French Abbot Diharce de Bidassouet complied and published a book titled, “Histoire des Cantabres”. In this book, the Abbot claims that Basque was the original language spoken by the creator. He starts the book with the following message in French (my translation is provided below):

“Tracer l'histoire du peuple basque, faire connoître le génie de sa langue, tel estle but que je me suis proposé en >écrivant cet ouvrage, dont je supplie VOTRE MAJESTÉ.” – Abbot Diharce de Bidassouet.

Translation: “To trace the history of the Basque people, to make known the genius of its language, that is the goal I set for myself in writing this book, I beg your Majesty.”

Around this same time period, the Gipuzkoan Basque priest Erroa made the bold statement that the Basque language was the language spoken in the Garden of Eden. For this, he appealed to the Bishop of Pamplona. Months of deliberations, delegations, and research were conducted in order to accept Erroa’s theory. A final judgment was made, in which the Bishop of Pamplona publicly acknowledged and pledged to the notion of Basque being the language in the Garden; yet, mysteriously all records of the delegations disappeared. One can only assume why….

Remember, it does not specifically matter if you “believe” in the Bible. The code will work itself out for you even if you see it only as a metaphor.

John Dee, Black Magic and Translation: The King James Bible.

Some of you might not realize, but the King James Bible was highly influenced, infiltrated, and translated from Latin to English by Sir John Dee, who worked for the Queen of England in the late 16th century. John Dee was a well known alchemist, astrologist, cryptographer, and translator. In addition, he was heavily influenced by occult studies, such as Enochian, what Sir John Dee called “The Language of the Angels”.

Dee was a magician of the highest caliber during the time. Queen Elizabeth even called upon him for astrology readings.

The King James Version of the Bible (1611) is simply nothing more than a socially engineered piece of work, as Dee and his compadre Sir Francis Bacon had numerous translation mistakes, in addition to leaving out specific books from the King James Bible. For example, the Books of Enoch, the Book of Jasper, and so many other unique texts were omitted in the KJV. Why is this so? Because in order to control a population, Dee, Bacon and Queen Elizabeth and King James removed, changed, and intentionally translated the text poorly to fit a specific agenda.

For example, the Hebrew word “Amein” means so be it or verily; it was not spelt as Amen as we use today. Furthermore, in Greek the equivalent is also “Amein”. What was the significance of this being changed?

The Egyptians had been worshipping the Sun God named Ra, for more than one thousand years BC. Remember what I said in the first post about the significance of the letters R and L? Here is where this comes into play….

R AND L: LINGUISTICS AND RELGION.

One question that can be answered by the deciphering of the English language is what did Adam and Eve eat in the garden? In answering this question, the Code tells of how a language that was once whole, became broken into several scattered pieces.

For instance, in English, imp, wimp, pimp, simp, gimp, shrimp, blimp, skrimp, crimp, primp, and pimp are all inclusive of irregular morphological aspects. Are there any one syllable “imp” words that do not? Do some sounds carry built in meanings? The answer to that is YES and I will be posting that in a future post.

However, not all words containing similar sounds have similar meanings; however, science begins by following meaningful patterns that already exist.

Why did the name of RA the sun-god become the Hebrew word for “evil”, RA? Was the ancient battle between the God of the Jews (EL) and the God of the Egyptians (RA) the result of some form of devilish “dyslexic” con-fusion between the sounds of R and L?

(Egyptian Sun God “Ra” illustrated above)

For example, for some children with dyslexia, their phonological patterns do not differentiate between the sounds of R and L; such as in CLOWN and CROWN. Many dyslexic or people with speech or language impairments have difficulty with these letters.

The sounds of R and L are interchangeable in Hebrew, Sanskrit, Egyptian, Several Oriental languages, and in Modern English (as we have seen in the first post), yet only in written forms can the exchange of these sounds be codified and analyzed.

Linguists refer to R and L as "liquids” in English. And at places 18 and 12 in the alphabet, they accent a specific perspective. This post cites a few R-L leaps where the meanings break through. And soon, we shall apply this process to find out what "evil" humanity ate in the garden.

The modern name Sally has its root in Sarah due to shifts in R and L. The R in Katharine appears as L in Kathleen. And Gerard and Gerald have the same origin.

Also, R and L are meaningfully related in words from many languages. For example, Glyph is "carving" in Greek. Graph is "writing." In Arabic, koran is "writing" while kalam is “speech”. And atsi-LA (אֲצִילָה) is a "giving" verb that means "vesting" or "delegating" in Hebrew while atsi-RA (צבירה) is a "taking" verb that means "hoarding" or "accumulating." Both of these verbs have derived roots in the word for "nobility," meaning the power to give and to take.

Did the Romans choose Latin or did Latins take Rome? In any event, ITALiaN is of LATIN origin. And the R and L (such as in the words/locations: IS-RA-EL, BE-RL-IN, and Je-R-usa-L-em) reflect the historic divisions of the right and left halves of our society.

So, the question follows. Say this out loud: IS – RA – EL ? This brings us to the question of: Is RA, the Egyptian Sun God, the same as the Hebrew El?

Post Three coming soon. Help spread knowledge. Knowledge is POWER.