<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 15:15:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/@crypt0mike/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Why all the reasons given against increasing the Bitcoin blocksize are bunk]]></title><description><![CDATA[As those who've been following/using Bitcoin over the past year(s) will probably be aware, Bitcoin has been crippled for some time now by its blocksize limit, which limits the number of transactions it]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/crypto/@crypt0mike/why-all-the-reasons-given-against-increasing-the-bitcoin-blocksize-are-bunk</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/crypto/@crypt0mike/why-all-the-reasons-given-against-increasing-the-bitcoin-blocksize-are-bunk</guid><category><![CDATA[crypto]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[crypt0mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:50:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/LcTxR7u1XKae8Zaj594qUJafNyNSBw9svATPAkZ7ve1XhZ4xxE2w5nA5EoWvv9NwtVLBMAZUdFGGDX24ft6ZDQTCFzBwSiPqRYzjr849fhLarbhy59dATmvnBb51kouKG7Qq1H8mPEupPgWPn8vEG6odp?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>