She was close with Hillary for almost a decade. Her lying, deceitful and unethical behavior has now been proven.
She has been caught lying about how the Democratic party ran their own primary. Clearly a biased process architected by Ms. Schultz and her direct reports in her role as Chairperson of the DNC, to ensure that her preferred candidate would win the primaries. And then go on to sink in the general election.
Dems cry Islamophobia, as Wasserman Schultz’s Pakistani IT guy arrested
Wasserman Schultz said through a spokesman that Awan was simply a “part-time employee, but his services have been terminated”.
But he’s more, much more, than that. Awan is the same guy who has made big bucks on the back of taxpayers for years, all while having largely unfettered access to computer-stored data from House Democrats. Can you say security breach? He’s also the same guy who just made a curious transfer of $283,000 to two individuals in Pakistan from his Longworth House Office Building, as reported by the Daily Caller News Foundation.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/26/wasserman-schultzs-pakistani-it-guy-arrested-airpo/
I am not the first to speculate, but I want to be early to speculate on steemit blockchain for a permanent record. So I can come back in 12 months and get some satisfaction with the simple, "Told you so".
What if Mr. Awan was the source of the leak of all the DNC material during the election, that the Democrats and the MSM have been trying to blame on the Russians? In that case, the Russians did not hack the DNC and leak to Mr. Assange. In that case, the Democrats were so incompetent that one of their own staffers, without the proper security clearances, was the source of the DNC material that ended up with Mr. Assange.
It is still a long shot, but we might see some of the criminal politicians that broke US law behind bars in the next couple of years. That might end up including Ms. Schultz, unless she rolls over on Hillary and then who knows who ends up behind bars.
Please upvote and resteem if you believe in the Rule of Law, and believe anyone who breaks the law should be treated as a criminal.
With appropriate deference to severity. Jay walking and treason are different crimes, that should have different outcomes for the criminal.
STEEM On!!
DaveB
some material from youtube and washingtontimes