<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:27:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/@everything/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[What is nothing?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Nothing A few months ago I was involved in a group discussion where a question was asked. "What is nothing?" The consensus: Nobody knows. However, I think "nothing" CAN be defined.]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/philosophy/@everything/what-is-nothing</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/philosophy/@everything/what-is-nothing</guid><category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[everything]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:36:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/MvwLKy3SfvJwXFKCRMDAFrt961KY92is9NL3MbwHY?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>