(I’ve been working on bitcoin’s design) since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn’t resist to keep thinking about it. Much more of the work was designing than coding. Fortunately, so far all the issues raised have been things I previously considered and planned for. - Satoshi, June 18, 2010
If you take the perspective that BitLattice is a bigger leap than from Bitcoin to Ethereum, it is innovating the structure of the state itself, from hash-chains (left image) which go back to the 80s to a multi-dimensional lattice linking together transaction hashes (right image),
and, is also building a sharding mechanism on top of that, proof-of-structure, then it makes sense that Ethereum was more open and communicated more, there was more language in place to understand Vitalik Buterin's idea, smart contracts were defined in 1997 by Nick Szabo[1], and the blockchain and the Nakamoto consensus in 2009 by Craig Wright.
"Writing a description for (bitcoin) for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to. " - Satoshi, July 5, 2010
Satoshi had worked on Bitcoin since 2007 and had not communicated it much before Bitcoin was up and running in 2009, because it was "bloody hard". Hibryda is doing the same thing, for the same reason.
BitLattice, a network-state with a hyper-lattice topology
The innovation in BitLattice is that the state is a hyper-lattice rather than a chain, and so it could add transactions in parallel, and verify the integrity of the state mathematically by using a property of lattices as metric structures, and send a wave function through BitLattice even as it is stored in "chunks" across thousands of nodes, each "mining" transactions on their piece of the lattice.
Since the lattice topology makes it fast, the idea is also to use a toroidal network topology for how nodes connect, making propagation of messages faster.
A toroidal network is a natural evolution of Craig Wright's small-world graph,