The experiences that are so held move toward becoming sedimented, they harden in memory as conspicuous and critical substances. Unless such sedimentation occurred the individual couldn't comprehend his history. Intersubjective sedimentation likewise happens when a few people share a typical history, experiences of which end up noticeably consolidated in a typical stock of knowledge.

Intersubjective sedimentation can be called genuinely social just when it has been objectivated in a sign system of some kind, when the likelihood of repeated objectification of the shared experiences emerges. At exactly that point is it likely that these experiences will be transmitted starting with one generation then onto the next, and starting with one collectivity then onto the next.

Regular movement, without a sign system, could be the reason for transmission. Observationally, this is doubtful. An impartially accessible sign system gives a status of nascent secrecy on the sedimented experiences by disconnecting them from their unique setting of solid individual life stories and making them for the most part accessible to all who share, or may share later on, in the sign system being referred to.

The experiences in this way turn out to be promptly transmittable. Ordinarily, the conclusive sign system is phonetic. Language objectivates the shared experiences and makes them accessible to all inside the semantic group, in this manner getting to be plainly both the premise and the instrument of the aggregate stock of knowledge.

Language gives the way to objectifying new experiences, permitting their fuse into the effectively existing stock of knowledge, and it is the most essential means by which the objectivated and objectified sedimentations are transmitted in the convention of the collectivity being referred to.

For instance, just a few individuals from a chasing society have the experience of losing their weapons and being compelled to battle a wild animal with their exposed hands. This alarming experience, with whatever lessons in fortitude, clever and ability it yields, is solidly sedimented in the cognizance of the people who experienced it.

On the off chance that the experience is shared by a few people, it will be sedimented intersubjectively, may maybe even frame a significant bond between these people. As this experience is assigned and transnutted phonetically, be that as it may, it winds up plainly open and, maybe, emphatically pertinent to people who have never experienced it.

The phonetic assignment abstracts the experience from its individual true to life events. It turns into a target plausibility for everybody, or at any rate for everybody inside a specific sort, it ends up noticeably mysterious on a fundamental level regardless of whether it is still connected with the accomplishments of particular people. Indeed, even to the individuals who don't envision the experience in their own particular future memoir, it might be pertinent in an inferred way, regardless it is a piece of the basic stock of knowledge.

The objectification of the experience in the language at that point permits its joining into a bigger assortment of convention by method for moral direction, persuasive verse, religious purposeful anecdote and so forth. Both the experience in the smaller sense and its limb of more extensive connotations would then be able to be educated to each new generation, or even diffused to a by and large extraordinary collectivity.

Image Source

References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness
http://www.bmeacham.com/whatswhat/ConsciousnessAndExperience.html
http://www.moustacheunderground.education/psy---the-human-experience.html