There are some odd facts about many "terrorist" attacks and school shootings. One oddity that repeats is the fact of drills being scheduled when an attack happens. This creates confusion. If it's real, people think it's a drill and don't respond properly. Or it could also be a fake event like a drill but purported to be real when it isn't.
Reality or Unreality?
You might recall having done some test drills at school for fire and bomb threats. I know it was done at my school. I've even done them while working in a corporate job. But what if the fire was real, and you thought it was only fake? What if the bomb threat, or someone attacking, was really happening? What is you though it was real, but instead it was fake?
Wouldn't you be really confused if something you thought was fake, was actually real? As far as you know in reality, there is no real threat, it's only a drill. If there are firemen, police, SWAT, actors with injuries, or whatever else to make it looks real, then it looks real but you were told it was fake, then even if it was real you would think it was fake.
And similarly, the opposite applies. If it's fake you would think and believe it's real if you were told it's real and saw all those emergency responders. Anyone watching a news report about a test drill, without being told it was a test drill and being told it was a "real" live event, would believe what the news tells them. This can apply to terror events or school shooting where no proof is supplied of what actually is alleged to have happened.
Some events are false flags where they are engineered by people in positions of authority to do harm others. They even set them up when there are drills to cause confusion but also for their agents to be ready to control the situation, carry out and cover up the deception.
The news feeds us a story, and we buy into it. The news tells us something is real, but it can be fake. They tell us something is fake, but it can be real. Behold the fakenews of the mainstream media, long before the fad of "fakenews" they try to use to disparage counter-information from alternative media sources.
Here are some famous attacks that had test drills on the same day:
9/11
9/11/2001
On the 11th of September, and prior, NORAD and other intelligence and emergency response agencies held drills to simulate almost the exact attack that took place on 9/11. This kept people distracted from dealing with the actual event, thinking it was a only drill. This also allowed testing of how viable an attack would be to pull off, say, for a conspiracy to be pulled off...
Vigilant Guardian - NORAD
Global Guardian - Pentagon
Tripod - New York, FEMA, Police, firemen, etc.
CIA Excersices - Jet crash
NORAD drills on 9/11
7/7 London bombings
7/7/2005
London had terror drills scheduled in their tube/metro/subway system on the day multiple attacks took place on those systems. With 52 dead, and over 700 injured, this was Britain's worst terror attack since Pan Am Flight 103's bombing in 1988, and it's first Islamic-based attack.
7/7/2005 London Bombings Terror Drills
Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting
12/14/2012
There was a drill going on in New Haven, Connecticut, not at Sandy Hook Elementary, but 14 miles away at St. Rose of Lima Elementary School. You can find footage where the news uses the other school instead of Sandy Hook, while claiming it is Sandy Hook, to talk about how Sandy HOok was being attacked by a shooter. Did it really happen?
People who took part in the mock drills, were also at Sandy Hook. Like the Sheriff. There are many inconsistencies with the official story, as there are with 7/7 and 9/11. If you look into this can of worms, you will be surprised at how unreal the reality we have been told about this shooting is.
Some schools have even carried out drills, while not even telling the children, and the whole time the kids think it's all real, being terrorized by the state. A drill can then be turned live, and who would know it was real or not? Could this have happened at Sandy Hook?
Sandy Hook: CNN Used St. Rose Of Lima School Drill Footage
Boston Marathon bombing
4/15/13
The Boston Marathon is a popular event every year. But in April 2013, it had bomb sniffing dogs, and other increased security such as roof spotters, yet police say they had no extra security threats that day. Witnesses say they heard a speaker say to keep calm during upcoming terror drills. Yet the officials won't admit to yet another terror drill, and even avoid denying there was a terror drill in some cases.
If there were no drills, why not just keep saying there were none? But then why do people say they heard it on the day of? Why was there all this extra security for a non-drill then, as if there was a real threat, or as if a pre-planned event had been orchestrated and needed to be managed immediately following...
Journalist to FBI: "Tell Us About the Bomb Drill!"
Marathon Runner: Loudspeaker Announcements warning people to remain calm during bomb drills
Coincidence of Events or Orchestrated Events?
How can it be that the same day there are drills are the same day a well orchestrated and planned out attack takes place? Out of all the days a drill could happen, it happens on the same day that the actual rare event takes place? It's not enough that the rare event actually happened, but that these rare events happened to coincide on the same day as scheduled drills?
Something is odd. Think about it, how many school fires, bombings or shootings to you hear about? The shooting in the past 2 decades have gone up, yes, but considering how many schools there are, it is rare, until recently.
So, what are the statistics of probability for this to happen, for an actual attack that is rare, to happen on the same exact day that a drill is planned?
The probability, P1, that an attack will happen on the day of a drill in a month is 1/30. The probability, P2 that an attack will happen within an hour of the drill that day (24h) is 1/24. The probability of both together, P3, is P3 = P1 * P2 = 1/30 * 1/24 = 1/720 = 0.00139.
Also, the more times in one day a terror drill is scheduled, the less likely it is to actually happen. The more variables you add the less likely something is to happen (more terror drills where an attack is less likely to happen). See the conjunction fallacy.
Why that day?
Remember, on these days, everyone is supposed to be prepared, ready and everything is setup to deal with an attack. Then an attack does happen.
But if the terrorists did know there were test drills scheduled, whereby the society would already be prepared to deal with an attack, would they really, honestly, do the attack? Think about it. Wouldn't you pick a day where there were no terror drills? Theses drills were planned weeks and months in advance. Famous attacks keep having test mock drills scheduled on the same day, over, and over and over. The odds of it happening once, ok, slim but maybe, but then over and over... yeah right! Why pick that day of all days? Either the "terrorists" are very unlucky or people in government are involved... seriously, it's not likely to "just" happen.
The drills are supposed to mean the emergency responders are already in place and are supposed to be prepared, and then the drill goes "live". They couldn't stop it, but they are ready to "manage" the aftermath. This conflicting information about doing a test (but is it really a test?) confuses people, because it's supposed to be mock test, and then all of sudden it's reality, it's "live". Flight controllers doing mock drills on 9/11 thought the planes changing direction on radar were not real.
Is this proof of anything nefarious on the part of the government? Not quite proof, but it begs questions and is something to think about. We can do some thinking about the info and put logical pieces together to see what makes sense and what doesn't.
Something fishy is going on. There is already proof of fakenews where they showed the terror drill of one school instead of the real one allegedly being attacked. They can show us things and we believe it. What else is being faked in these events? Thanks to the Internet we have more access to info and can put pieces together. People question these events and come up with interesting research. I recommend you doing your own research to see how the events we are told about have issues with them and something else can be occurring contrary to what we've been told.
References:
- Drills staged during Terror attacks: Coincidence or Conspiracy?
- Examining When Drills Are Used to Commit False Flags
- Complete 911 Timeline
Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.
If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
me for more content to come!
My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.