The mathematics of mid-wittery.
Everything is connected, and so to is this post to all my other recent posts.
Before I undress the midwit yet again ( I will be doing lots of that ), understanding the math is important.
It gives context to the size of problem.
The midwit has an IQ between the ranges of 110 -125.
This means that in the IQ bell curve distribution model,(see below) the midwit accounts for approx. 8-10 % of the population, allowing for 50% of that IQ range not being midwits.
That’s not too large a number.
The fact of the matter is however, that they are the authoritarian loving sycophants - whatever the current authority/cultural zeitgeist that's in power, or in vogue, at the time.
They act as the natural grease that oils the wheels of bureaucracy, and it shows as more of a testament to their well honed social skills rather than having any consciously nefarious objectives.
The end product of their dynamics - the decay and entropy of society is, for them - by accident, rather than by design.
The design is orchestrated by people above them, in both the social hierarchy, and IQ.
They really are 'the useful idiots' for the manipulators at the very top of the food chain.
They have put their social talents to very good use in finding their own ‘will to power’.
REMEMBER: Not all individuals within this IQ range are midwits.
.....but all midwits are within this IQ range.
I've found no evidence to show any breakdown in actual numbers in terms of proportions of the midwits/non midwit, in this IQ range.
This being the case, and for purposes of this post - I've said (arbitrarily ) that the proportions break down to 50% of both midwit and non midwit.
Without more data, this seems to be as an objective a number as is possible.
(I would hope that the proportions would be much higher in favor of the non midwit, but that is just that - hope, nothing more).
So, if 10% of individuals within this IQ range are midwits – and the current economic, political, and social situation that we find ourselves in at present is supported by them (leftism/ liberalism) it means that from a meta societal level you really do have to appreciate how they’ve exploited their ‘social skills gift’ (unknowingly to them of course) .
It's a curse to a prosperous society, however .
It doesn’t make their rise to the positions of power any better - but credit given, where where credits due.
On second thoughts - scrap the accolades.
IF they were sentient in their actions, then the accolades would be valid - but seeing as they are the closet thing to non sentient, organic, automatons - it can hardly stand as valid.
Interesting observation....
Is there any coincidence that 'the automatons in society' - the midwit - also appear to be, to a large extent - highly vocal proponents - and enthusiasts, of the 'new technology' and AI?
....Maybe they see something - qualities - in AI robots, that resonates as 'a connection' at some deeper level within themselves?
...If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck… blah blah..
I’m not writing post after post about Midwits, just for the fun of it, or because they're such an easy target...I wish that were the case, I really do.
The reason that they're taking such a central role in my posts is because THEY ARE THAT IMPORTANT.
Do you think - for one moment - that ‘the technocratic push’ that we see being implemented every single day across the globe - would have been possible to date - or would have ANY chance of succeeding , without the mid-wits active support?
Not a chance.
Do you think that the efficient German war machine would have conquered and controlled most of Europe without the mid-wit’s active cooperation?
Not a chance.
THAT is why it is so important to get to grips with this segment of society, and their psychology.
IT IS THAT IMPORTANT.
If there were no mid-wits in positions of power there would be less chance of any centralization ever taking place.
Government bureaucracies, political offices, and academic institutions ARE power.
One world governments ?
They would never be allowed to form, not without the sycophantic dynamics that go on naturally among 'the midwit classes'.
The last few decades long of midwit infestation of bureaucracy means that it’s now become a case of the ‘the tail wagging the dog’ rather that the other way around.
On a global scale.
It’s only by illustrating clearly all the various aspects of the midwit psychology that people start to comprehend what it is that we’re dealing with.
THERE IS NO OLIGARCHICAL (OR PLUTOCRATIC) STRUCTURE IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND , THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE WITHOUT THE MID WIT!
Yup,... that’s how important this is.
...my next post will be discussing oligarchy and the legitimacy of "the iron law of oligarchy".
And why - if we 'lean into it' rather than pretend that this 'iron law' doesn't exist (or try to change it, heaven forbid), we still have time to come through it - without the destruction and collapse of society that will happen if the midwit is allowed to maintain their positions of power.
Which brings me to messaging.
Or rather, the very poor delivery of it to date – by myself.
I’m blessed/cursed with a relatively high IQ.
This isn't an ego trip or a look at me ‘I’m great’ thing.
It is a verifiable objective reality.
And this is where I’ve fucked up….
How?
I conceptualize everything in my noggin.
To me, it is all very clear.
The connections of personality, politics, psychology, philosophy, etc….does, to me, all fit in to one 'whole', with a million offshoots of evidence, argument, and facts, to support the whole.
It’s not a fixed world .
It’s forever changing, depending on the inputs (new information).
This information is then assimilated into 'the whole', to either add value to my model, or to be discarded as valueless, for now...
Thus the whole mental model that I have, is perpetually shifting around.
When I write my blogs, I’d say that about 80% of the time – I do a pretty crap job (by my own standards).
I cut corners , I assume people know what it is that I’m trying to express .
Which then of course, ends up being detrimental to the ‘finished product’.
The assuming I do, of people of already understanding my points,is something that have to work/have had to work on / am working on, on daily basis.
It’s an expression of my frustrations, it's not arrogance.
Being unable to ‘get my point across' in a few words is something I'm forever working on.
Honestly!
There isn’t enough space on the entire internet to hold everything that I have to say - and that's scientific fact!
Even as I was formulating this post, my own stupidity gave me good smack around the head.
Me and Stupidity have very frequent conversations.
Far too many.
Due to my own conceptualizations - which are clear to me - and then my crude attempts to put them down into writing – I’ve been missing the whole goddamn point!
Which is?....(I hear you ask, in my head)…
I’m not trying to communicate with the midwits!
Antagonize them? Yes
Annoy them? Most certainly.
Not as any kind if vindictive action, but as one to serve as an illustration to external observers, the veracity of my position.
Veracity – authenticity, is important.
Without these in place - the midwit wins the psychological game of oppressing those that they feel threatened by.
They work well together, remember - They work in packs.
To illustrate what I mean...
It’s hard for a midwit to deny being an authoritarian loving sycophant, if they’re promoting the BBC as a legitimate source of news ( for example).
If I can annoy/antagonize/make emotionally reactive, the midwit – by using 'the BBC is a provably stupid propaganda machine deigned for idiots to absorb' in defense of an arguments – my work is done.
Others can then see the internal mechanisms and psychology at play. (in this case, using the the BBC).
Using this as an example – it would illustrate of the love of authority – in spite of the fact that this ‘authoritative source’ has being debunked repeatedly, and shown to be peddling propaganda and even reporting downright lies, acting in in that role.
The 'attacking of the midwit' is not about the midwit at all.
It's ALL about showing other people - those who are not midwits - of their existence!
My pointing them out and mocking them for this position is not an attack on them (those midwits with weak ego formation will automatically construe it a such though... bless).
Did you notice I added the word ‘bless’ at the end?
This was quite unnecessary.
THAT was – with purpose – inserted to antagonize the weak ego’d midwit.
I'm trying to paint a picture - like an artist - for the world to see for themselves.
They are then are free to draw their own conclusions.
I've a confidence in people, one in which they are able to see the truth from untruth, if left to see the facts as they are.
THAT is not an IQ thing.
It's been the continual distortion of facts – of reality - that has led us to were we are now, and the insane confusion that pervades everything.
And the midwit is RESPONSIBLE for that.
You don't NEED an IQ over 50, to know that there are two sexes.
You.... just.... don't.
This distortion of reality has only been made possible over this last few decades by the midwit.
A distortion of information fed by the disingenuous.
Untruths intended to muddy the waters.
And thus, making it more difficult for those with lower IQ's (90-105?) to discern reality from fiction, truth from lies, for themselves.
My ‘attacks on the midwit are to clear the waters, not muddy them - and then let people decide for themselves.
The truth from lies.
For those that are in the IQ ranges of over 100+ - those that are not midwits ....there is no need to point it out.
They’re already more than intelligent enough to see it for themselves.
I’m preaching to the choir, as it were.
To those with an equal or higher IQ than myself – ditto.
There’s no need to explain anything.
(although, they might help to explain more things to me, which is always appreciated).
No, my messaging has been all ‘off’.
My message needs to understood clearly by those with IQ's lower than the 110 ranges that we’re talking about.
I’m no intellectual snob, and I see no ‘superiority’ just because I have few more efficient synapses, going off at once, in the cranium.
(any midwits reading this cannot comprehend that reality – as they live in a space of constant intellectual insecurity – they live in a fear mindset, mostly unconsciously. ...bless).
So..... how to connect to those that DO matter.
The important majority of people.
What is the best way to convey my points to the majority?
Pictures! (memes might come under that banner, also).
They can convey a message (if presented correctly) , far better than a thousand words of my wafflings, trying (poorly) to express what I intend to express.
I have no data on this either - but I'd virtually guaranteed that 'the resistance' to visual imagery as a ‘negative’ way to communicate, comes from the midwit proportion of society.
Why?
Because - just like using mockery to highlight flaws in arguments, the midwit has no defense against the truth that the image can show.
It's absorbed in the blink of an eye, and as such, is already in the brain - without any chance for the midwit to politicize and twist the truth.
i.e the first opportunity to paint a different – false - narrative is taken away...
The faux self image of intellectual superiority (that they continually prop themselves up with) – vanishes with images and humor as a medium.
No wonder they hate memes.
The midwit is very condescending to those with lower IQ’s.
And very threatened by those with higher IQ’s.