There has been a resurgence of an old childhood nemesis in recent years, and the Big Pharma forces and their vaxxinator allies in Congress want to blame YOU, if you are not one to submit to unwanted jabs of dangerous heavy metals. Pertussis, better known by it's popular name, "whooping cough," was a very common and sometimes severe disease among younger people and children in North America prior to the 1960s. Through the natural, high/low-contamination cycle that all infectious diseases go through, and possibly due to some limited success with nascent pertussis vaccination programs, the disease mostly disappeared during the the 70s and 80s, but has made a resurgence DUE TO FAILED VACCINATIONS in recent years. But, the CDC and their deep-pocketed paymasters want to blame you, even though the science is clear that they are to blame.
Check out this article:
https://vaxxter.com/health-officials-claim-unvaccinated-causing-whooping-cough-resurgence/
Here is a key excerpt from the above link:
"'This disease is back because we didn’t really understand how our immune defenses against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,' said Christopher J. Gill, associate professor of global health and lead author of the article. 'Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may made some crucial errors. This is definitely not where we thought we’d be in 2017.'
'The resurgence of pertussis in the US to its highest levels since the 1940s emphasizes the need for answers to these questions,' the authors wrote."
Despite the fact that some doctors are admitting the truth, there are still many attempts ongoing to blame those who fail to submit to dangerous and unproven diseases. Take this example, for example:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088399
An excerpt:
"Overall, 351 pertussis cases occurred among children aged 2 months to 10 years of age residing in 72 distinct zipcodes. Among unvaccinated or poorly vaccinated cases, their median date of onset was at calendar day 117 (April 26, 2012), whereas for those who were fully or mostly vaccinated the median date of onset was 41 days later, at day 158 (June 6, 2012). Within each local zip code area, the unvaccinated cases were 3.2 times more likely than vaccinated cases to have earlier median dates of onset."
Now, let's look at the above for a second. There were over 48,000 total cases of pertussis in 2012--the year of "the big outbreak." (Here is a chart showing historical numbers of cases, per year, going back 100 years: https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/surv-reporting/cases-by-year.html) Now, the above study looked at less than 3/4 of one percent of the cases of pertussis in 2012, and admitted to looking only at unvaccinated and "POORLY VACCINATED" areas--without explaining the criteria used for determining which areas to cherry pick for their "study." Is "poorly vaccinated" based on improper vaccine brews used in those areas? Is it based on under-dosage? Stale-dated vaccines? Or, do they simply mean low-levels of vaccination in those areas they cherry-picked? They say nothing about how many "unvaccinated" there were (could have been just one, right?) versus how many cases of "poorly vaccinated" they cherry-picked, right?
In short, the "study" is outrageously flawed--by its own admission-- but is still being promoted by the government as "proof" that those refusing the vaccine are responsible for the spike in 2012. And, if there modern vaccines are so effective and wonderful, why are we still seeing annual numbers since 2012 that are 20 times the lows of the 70s?
Look, it really boils down to this...You either decide that big government is trustworthy and doesn't lie, or that it does. It's really that simple.
Follow the money.
The truth will be right behind it.