Rape or coitus outside marriage is a very serious problem and it is very common and not even uncommon it is ignored by the law enforcers. Plus more the presence of the reluctance of victims to report becuase it still melekatnya the culture of shame in the community to discuss the issue of rape. It is very complicate to penalties against the perpetrators of such crimes.
Rape is a crime of the current conventional increasingly frequent but always difficult for trial because one of them is the presence of keenganan victims to report it. Nevertheless it's been equally understandably that that criminal acts of rape either by juridical and sociological action is very immoral.
Until now each of the pros and cons of going over the conception and understanding of the crime of rape and promiscuity outside of marriage so that occurred when intercourse outside of marriage on the basis of the same likes likes then the offender freed from bondage, pidananya. A very sad even when victims report such cases, the perpetrator of the alleged victims had already been directly answer such a feat. When the victims insist on top of its report, the offender even create reports back on the basis of his good name pollution
Related to this, they would disadvantage the PENAL CODE lies in having a sense of the scope of the criminal offence of rape which exclude several things, among them ignorant of the rapes that occur in the household, the exclusion of rape is not done without penetration of the penis into the vagina, set aside the rape done without coercion but physical coercion is done indirectly by mengiming-imingkan married him later or quote and hokey pokey others.
source
From the reality of the above need for harmonization of the rules so that the application of sanctions did not occur, and the controversy can be applied as the law of life
