Own property, history itself, heritage alone, but let alone to maintain and maintain, to take the right policy on the region of history and even then have to wait for the decision and direction from other parties. So maybe we do not say much about the improvement of fate, about the dignity and dignity let alone about self-sovereignty on the land itself.
We are not the people. It is better to talk about the mental defeats we suffer, and about the willingness to live under the feet of others, if only to "liberate" some hectares of inherited land of our predecessors must wait for instructions from others. Instead of suggesting others to support our steps in caring for "individual change," it waits for people who do not understand much about what we are doing what we deserve.
What kind of mental is this? In fact, the problem is only in preserving the area "incit tapak indatu and because naureung nyan, na geutanyoe" as a sign that they ever attend and have built the identity that we have today. Sorry, if some of these sentences seem provocative, itupun already in brake 'as far as possible than the actual must be said. However, if this phrase is considered provocative, then there is a more provocative sentence again, but really in its meaning.
Hasan Tiro (His Majesty's Wali Nanggroe Said) said: "Well, our history has been everything, and we know everything like that before." (Aceh history is everything, and we know it from the first.I went home for the sake of history, nothing more). Such was the recording of Metro TV.
Really we want this peace a dignified peace, not a peace to repeat the tears and tears that this nation has ever passed.