Kashmir, India and Pakistan have been the center of conflict between the past 72 years. But the reality is that there is no real way of Kashmir Indo-Pak tension. Its origins are the Communal Partition of India which took place in 1947. The roots of the Kashmir problem are actually hidden in this communal division which is the bloodbiz of tension. Pakistan always calls Kashmir an 'unfinished agenda of partition'. While Kashmir for India is a symbol of the notion that its partition for a secular country, India was a big mistake.
It was a circumstantial event when divided India, when it was ruled by a Muslim majority and ruled by a princely state. Later, if India had established its supremacy on Kashmir, the intention behind it was a symbol of denial of previous communal divisions. At the same time, it was also indicative of the fact that despite India being divided by Muslim sectarians, there is a secular country, which has a very large population of Muslim devotees in every corner, which is equal to the number of Pakistan and Bangladesh's population is.
In this historic perspective, the ongoing communal separatism in Kashmir is not a new issue, but it is a bloodbase of partition of Pakistan, which is due to either being separated from India due to the Muslim domination of Kashmir. Or the Islamic nation is practicing near Pakistan.
Salute to the understanding of Kashmiri who sees the security of their identity, with a secular India. But the question is, in this troubled state, the name already connected in Kashmir is Jammu, why is not he talking about separation? Clearly, the roots of this separatism are not cultural, but rather communal, like Bangladesh. From Pakistan's point of view, he thinks that he lost Bengal in 1971 because he was not coming under the influence of Punjabi-dominated Pakistan at the cultural and political level, whereas in order to achieve the Muslim-dominated Kashmir, Kind of Approval is approved.
In view of the constitutional, legal and even international level, Pakistan does not dominate Kashmir, because the United Nations resolution has violated Pakistan before India. Because he did not separate himself from Kashmir occupied by the tribals, which he had to do according to UN resolution. Not only that, Pakistan has attacked India three times in Kashmir with utmost confidence, but in all three she had to face defeat. In such a situation, Pakistan is completely convinced that its policy of jihad on Kashmir, that is, the policy of pseudo-warrior settles for it, through which it managed to get around 40% of Kashmir's share in October 1947 and During this time, he got the aim of connecting its eastern part 'Aksai Chin' to China and connecting him with a strategic link.
Salute to the understanding of Kashmiri who sees the security of their identity, with a secular India. But the question is, in this troubled state, the name already connected in Kashmir is Jammu, why is not he talking about separation? Clearly, the roots of this separatism are not cultural, but rather communal, like Bangladesh. From Pakistan's point of view, he thinks that he lost Bengal in 1971 because he was not coming under the influence of Punjabi-dominated Pakistan at the cultural and political level, whereas in order to achieve the Muslim-dominated Kashmir, Kind of Approval is approved.
In view of the constitutional, legal and even international level, Pakistan does not dominate Kashmir, because the United Nations resolution has violated Pakistan before India. Because he did not separate himself from Kashmir occupied by the tribals, which he had to do according to UN resolution. Not only that, Pakistan has attacked India three times in Kashmir with utmost confidence, but in all three she had to face defeat. In such a situation, Pakistan is completely convinced that its policy of jihad on Kashmir, that is, the policy of pseudo-warrior settles for it, through which it managed to get around 40% of Kashmir's share in October 1947 and During this time, he got the aim of connecting its eastern part 'Aksai Chin' to China and connecting him with a strategic link.
Kargil encroachment in the year 1999 was the second episode of the fierce battle of 1947, in which India had to fight for reclaiming its territory. Right now, in the Pakistani dictatorship, the belief has come that the goal of Kashmir will not be achieved by them, not by their army, but in the shadow of its shadow and the terrorist groups running. Interestingly, Imran Khan's praise was also appreciated in India on the return of congratulations, while the question is: What was the last such initiative that India's perspective has been tackling on those terrorist groups? It was Pakistan who returned to India by killing the dead soldiers of India, who had returned the Indian Pilot congratulatory arrest to gain its moral edge in the pressure of the United States or on the aggressive India, it would be the military of India There is an effort to reduce the aggression instantly, nothing more than that.
The conflict between India and Pakistan on Kashmir is to be resolved, for this the last way is to go in its fold. Because this war between India and Pakistan was done in the past in Bangladesh. Then it took about Khalistan, and now it is about Kashmir. It may also happen in Sindh and Balochistan in the coming days. Who is responsible for all these cylinds of duality? It was not even responsible communalist Muslim League, its actual responsibility was the British Empire, who, after having adopted the policy of 'divide and rule' to control its own large country like India.
Through this, the British served not only the dream of India's second largest religion, that is, to a different country, but also to execute it. The result of this is that in the ongoing 72-year conflict between India and Pakistan, Kashmir is not only Kashmiri, but Pakistan is interested in whole of India's separatism. If you look carefully, it is known that the root cause of the conflict between India and Pakistan is not Kashmir but it is a division. This thing will be seen by the fanatics of Pakistan and now a few fundamentalists of India will be uneasy. But it is true that it is sixteen that its seed went to the British Bolk and the result is that our soldiers have to suffer by sacrificing. To be seen, the creation of Pakistan was immoral and that is why it is an unsuccessful country.