Awe, how cute. I didn't even tag you and you took special interest in me all by yourself. I'm absolutely complimented. No seriously, thats not even sarcasm.

Just for fun, I'm going to state the obvious again as I have stated it before.

I didn't say I was blacklisted for plagiarism or theft, I've simply referenced that when you originally accused me of both, that your "evidence" you presented was screen shots of my own content.

Next -- I keep asking you why your invisible rules differ from the Steemit FAQ. As you said, I did not know much about Steemit (I quickly got the crash course with this situation though) and as I also had admitted to many, many times. Which was part of my main point.

When I originally asked you who are you? When I asked are you a co-owner of Steemit? When I asked you where you get your authority from -- those are newbie questions, in case you hadn't noticed. So acting as if I never admitted that I was a newbie to Steemit is kind of cute. :)

You could have just explained who you were, and that would have solved my "magical powers" inquiry (which was sarcasm on my part phrasing it that way in the video) but what fun would that have been for you? I mean lets be honest -- giving newbies a hard time is much more entertaining than answering their questions.

I also find it amusing that you directly correlate "new to Steemit" as being synonymous with "new to computers". No techie is fluent with every single piece of technology that exists. Nice try though.

I've already said that the only thing I've accused you of is being a sociopath. I still stand by that.

You also have a strange definition of spam. Posting to one's own profile, is spamming. You might want to add the 7 to 8 posts per day limit into the FAQ. I won't hold my breath waiting, though. Lets see how many more new users fall into the same trap I did. Sounds like it makes the Steemit experience more exciting that way, right? :)