Green Bay, WI - Recently, and active member of the Steemit community, a local poster by the name of 
Hive account@contentcrusader, was absolutely shocked to hear that the reason for his low rewards is that his content generally sucks.
"I was so sure that the reason was 
Hive account@steemsports draining the reward pool. I'm shocked, stunned. That's all I can say", said Hive account@contentcrusader, busy crafting a post about a scientific analysis of paint drying, noting that his mind numbing content about Important Topics should have intrinsic value to the community.
Hive account@contentcrusader went on to add that he is totally not on Steemit for the rewards, and doesn't even care about them at all, unless someone is making too much. Then there is an issue.
"The system should be fair, content that sucks should have the same rights as all other content", said 
Hive account@mundanemike, a veteran Steemit Justice Warrior, frustrated about rewards going to topics he himself does not personally care about, nor understand.
When asked whether it'd be a good idea to use to produce content that doesn't suck in order to generate more rewards, 
Hive account@contencrusader claims "Absolutely not."
Indeed, the way to fight this battle seems to be to drive everybody else away from the platform.
We will keep you posted while the story develops.
