STINC delegations might affect witness votes less directly, but still

I was replied twice that delegated Steem-Power does not affect voting power of any of the 2 parties involved in a delegation.
A delegation still:

1. increases curation rewards
2. potentially mutual votes.
3. grants quite a bit of weight to the receiver of a delegation.
4. Helps channels owned STEEM in a more flexible way to achieve desired goals.
5. Increases deterrence against potential downvoters, which at least potentially increases author rewards
6. Increases both author and curation rewards in cases of self votes.
7. Allows a freer behavior due to increased RCs (Resource Credits)
8. Most importantly, in the case of STINC delegations to self proclaimed and semi-official abuse police, large abusers pay their protection fees to the corrupt cartel/police by voting to their witnesses, and hence despite the self vote to own witness is not affected by the delegations as directly as I thought, it still affects their witness ranking.

I write this as another continuation to one o
f my threads:
https://steemit.com/steem/@stimialiti/in-case-you-are-still-unaware-ned-s-stinc-controls-the-appointments-of-the-top-of-the-witness-list-by-delegations-to-its-proxies

The sole purpose of the busy tag here is to get the busy.pay vote.

2018-10-17