There are no photos of earth. Go and prepare your popcorn, get your beer out of the fridge or blaze a doobie – do whatever you need to do to ponder over this assertion. Even better, read this article and look at the images provided with a sober mind.
It's 2018 (allegedly), photography has been around for approx. 200 years, and NASA (and later all the other space agencies) has been going to space (allegedly) for 50 years. Yet, they can't produce authentic, unmanipulated photographic evidence of their oblate spheroid.
Sure, there are depections of the ball. But here's the catch: Not a single one of them is genuine. If they're not paintings (pre-Photoshop days), they have been tampered with in other ways. You can examine the image captions online for example, where it oftentimes says 'composite image'. In other instances, NASA admits that the graven image is in fact a rendering.
What I need you to do now, my dear globe bredren and sistren, is to hit the source link in each case, blow up the artwork and examine it. Remove your blinders, study the cartoons, and ask yourself: do they look real? Why do the sizes of the continents change, while the circumference of the sphere stays the same? Where are all the other luminaries? Is there any rational explanation for the missing satellites, albeit there are allegedly thousands up there? How come there are repetitive cloud patterns, copy-and-paste-style? Why are the shapes perfect circles, when the earth purportedly is an oblate spheroid? Search your own images and be surprised that some blue marbles appear to be straight outta waterworld.
Photo allegedly taken by EPIC on August 26, 2015 a mere 1.5 MILLION KILOMETRES away from earth. Source: https://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=87167
Same camera around the same time, and about the same distance as the first photoshop, erm, "shot". First view of alleged dark side of the moon. Source: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=86353
Photo allegedly taken by Apollo 10 in May 1969. Source: https://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo10/html/as10-34-5026.html
Source: https://pics-about-space.com/real-earth-from-space-nasa?p=3
After you have done so, can you still look into the mirror and say: those are one hundert percent legit! If the answer is yes, then I'd have to redirect you to our good friend Paul On The Plane. In his photo forensic work, which you can do yourself to verfiy, he finds an extraordinary amount of anomalies. He uses words like opacity, noise, or ambient, and in case you're not a pro photographer, the guy himself explains it best. Here's the playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsC3-1VrZpmukUN4JSuSjFz11WHVnjSrr
We are not the enemy. We are solely pointing out inconsistencies to you. We are not trolling either. This is some serious business – it's flat out the single most important thing in life, when you come to think of all the other ramifications this deception encloses. Mark my words, those who speak the truth make plenty of sacrifices. We are being ridiculed at first, and ostracised in the end. Yes, we are here to take away your precious little marble, but the globortion only hurts a wee bit for a short time, and the real world that awaits you is a thousandfold more fun to marvel at.
Words by They Lie We See / switzerflatland
Find fact no. 1 here: https://steemit.com/science/@switzerflatland/the-reality-of-the-fake-globe-fact-no-1
Continue with no. 5:https://steemit.com/flatearth/@switzerflatland/the-reality-of-the-fake-globe-fact-no-5