Clarification
This is an opinion piece. My opinions are based on facts, but they also got a lot to do with conclusions I reached that many of you might disagree with. In this article I will not argue against the fact that we see a rise of temperature, I will argue against its severity. The Hysteria behind the Climate Change is the real hoax. I don't see myself as anti-environment, but the way the topic is discussed in the media led me to doubt the official story. This article came to be after a discussion with 
( Hybrid of brown bear and ice bear), source
We live in an ice age
Many people are not aware that, scientificly speaking, we are at the end of an ice age. Having polar caps is not a normal state of earth, it is a sign of an ice age. Polar bears are a quiet recent species that evolved from brown bears in the dawn of a long cold period 4 million years ago. In a German Zoo it was proven that there can be hybrids between the two species (link to german article). These hybrids are most likely fertile. Nature finds a way and has many mechanisms to cope with climate change. Now lets look a couple more million years back into the history of climate change.
500 millions years of climate change
Temperature of earth in °C compared to average value
Time in million years------------------------------------------------Time in millenia, source
As you can maybe tell, this graph displays the real hoax. Climate change is normal for earth and it happened rapidly in the past, for example during the Paleocene-Eocene. Many other parts of the graph indicate as well that small jumps of a few degree are quite common. You can also see that the last 5 million years have been damn cold. Becoming warmer would be the earth normalizing its temperature.
Prognoses
Meteorology is a difficult and complex science. It is almost impossible to predict weather and climate correctly because of all the factors involved. Hence I will not even try to dispute the speculations of +5 degree Celsius in 2100. I'm pretty sure that if I research the raw data I will find many questionable methods used in these speculations.
Edit: This article was criticized for not refuting the arguments made by the establishment aka the consens. Thus I started a series in which I want to analyze the data given by nasa.gov on the topic. https://steemit.com/politics/@thatgermandude/my-data-is-better-than-yours-1-climate-change-data-1-the-beginning
(source)
Danger from rising sea levels and similar symptoms of climate change
People have always been drawn to coastlines, rivers and even volcanos. These settlements often had to endure floods and similar catastrophes. The people often manage to survive but usually lose their home and have to face huge financial damage. We need to help those people in the case of disaster, but we cant prevent it from happening. On a quick left biased side note: Coast Line Estate is very expensive. Private beaches and islands are often owned by the top 1%, I think this is a big reason why the climate change lobby is that strong.
Résumé
Climate Change is an important topic and we should keep our eyes on potential danger. But all the Hysteria about it is just not justified. There are much more severe threats like giant underground methane bubbles that we should worry about, instead Climate Change is currently used as an political weapon. They try to centralize a CO2 regulations. Worldwide. I hope you know that this could establish a precedent for a world government.