(credit)
And when you think this whole sjw/gender fluidity/leftist craziness can't go any further you see something like this on the head lines and they prove you how wrong you are...... I am so dumbfounded by the headline I find it really hard to comment something... But what left me even more dumbfounded is this line:
"Regardless, Martucci and Barnhill mask their agenda by also making the unconvincing secondary argument that describing breastfeeding as “natural” fuels the anti-vaccine movement. "
Don't get me wrong. I am as pro-vaccine as someone can get... what's the next excuse these people will use to promote their BS politics? That breast feeding fuels the flat-earth movement or something?
But let's take their argument seriously for a second... The whole anti-vaccine movement is something relatively new, at least to the extent it has reached today. I would say it's on the rise on the past decade or something.
If they were right you would expect the older we go back in time, the stronger the anti-vaccine movement would be. After all, "conservative" values like "breastfeeding is natural" were much, much more prevalent back in the 50s and 60s! This definitely didn't stop people from lining up to get vaccinated against polio or whatever! So, yeah, they definitely got the root of the problem wrong. (Note: I put the word "conservative" in quotes because it feels we have reached the point that saying "breastfeeding is natural" makes you a conservative, perhaps even a far-right shitlord!)
But I can play the stupid arguments game too! For example, the anti-vaccine movement is on the rise in the past decade and so is the sjw madness. Therefore, sjw stupidity fuels the anti-vaccine movement! Much like how global warming is caused by the decline of pirates:
(credit)
I guess these scientists haven't heard the old chinese saying about correlation and causation.
Excuse me now as I will leave you to bang my head on a wall until I pass out.