So you want someone to be able to sue a company for misuse of their product?
If you drive your car into a pedestrian, should that pedestrian be allowed to sue Toyota? Why?
If someone buys a baseball bat and uses it to murder their neighbor, is Walmart at fault? Should Rawlings be held accountable?
Say I decide I'm just gonna drink some bleach today, or eat a Tide pod, should I then be able to file a lawsuit against Clorox and Tide because I'm a dumb ass that misused their product?
If my car explodes while I'm just driving it, then Ford is responsible and liable. If my car explodes because I drained the oil and went drag racing, then who is responsible for that?
Gun manufacturers can be and are held liable for faulty products. They are not held liable for the misuse of their product, just like any other company.
The misuse of products does not and should not open a company to lawsuits, whether they manufacture cleaning supplies, cars, or guns. Allowing lawsuits simply for manufacturing a product, that a hundred million people manage to use safely by the way, is absolutely and entirely a backdoor way to eliminate gun manufacturers through bankruptcy.
RE: Weapons manufactures have no incentive to protect #WeThePeople.