<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:29:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/af80400mm/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[AF 80-400MM F/4.5-5.6D ED VR]]></title><description><![CDATA[NOTE: This article was first published over at johncaz.net on the 29th March 2014 INTRO So you have done some research and found a lot of negative reports on the 80-400mm VR lens and are worried that they]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/photography/@johncaz/af-80-400mm-f-4-5-5-6d-ed-vr</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/photography/@johncaz/af-80-400mm-f-4-5-5-6d-ed-vr</guid><category><![CDATA[photography]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[johncaz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:43:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/3W72119s5BjWPGGUiZ9pqnZoj8JHYxCCp9dtn2QVeZx6r1RbYTpcVnAwSZtzzGTUCAtNkobN9iz2EF4Fx9JLsPU1BgssYpAVawTEfeFjdVGopZkpb94Qy4?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>