<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:18:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/carlkruse/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[EOS vs The SEC:  Commentary on The B1 Settlement]]></title><description><![CDATA[Q. With the recent agreement between the SEC and Block.One can we now say EOS is not a security as some commentators are saying? A. No. The SEC considers the original B1 ERC-20 tokens to be unregistered]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/eos/@carlkruse/eos-vs-the-sec-commentary-on-the-b1-settlement</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/eos/@carlkruse/eos-vs-the-sec-commentary-on-the-b1-settlement</guid><category><![CDATA[eos]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[carlkruse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:22:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>