<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:14:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/dknow-answer-chess/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Are there any chess openings that could be played that haven't been studied extensively, but could still work?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Question originally asked on Musing.io - Click here to see other answersA2A It depends on how deeply you wish to start. For example, the Berlin Defence to the Ruy Lopz (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6) wasn’t]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/chess/@jonching/f3qsryg2a</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/chess/@jonching/f3qsryg2a</guid><category><![CDATA[chess]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[jonching]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 09:45:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>