<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:33:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/dknow-question-chess/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Are there any chess openings that could be played that haven't been studied extensively, but could still work?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Question originally asked on Musing.io - Click here to see answersChess is da bess]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/chess/@sakujo/f32sfzgns</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/chess/@sakujo/f32sfzgns</guid><category><![CDATA[chess]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[sakujo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 09:41:06 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>