<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 19:26:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/epistemic-logic/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Newcomb's Problem and Epistemic Logic]]></title><description><![CDATA[We analyze what's wrong with the ('the', meaning the most obvious prima facie) argument for A+B using epistemic logic and game theory. As is often the case there is a hidden implicit premise in the argument]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/philosophy/@cdelastella/newcomb-s-problem-and-epistemic-logic</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/philosophy/@cdelastella/newcomb-s-problem-and-epistemic-logic</guid><category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[cdelastella]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 04:39:48 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/S5Eokt4BcQdk7EHeT1aYjzebg2hC7hkthT45e3qjN66AuiogJSzCViFwS1CvmefeEAJosSN?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>