<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:13:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/f1000research/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Plagiarism & blockchain timestamping gone awry: the most interesting case of scientific irreproducibility?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Below is a post from my Satoshi Village Blog on March 08, 2017. The original post is titled "The most interesting case of scientific irreproducibility?" and is released under a CC BY 4.0 License.]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/timestamping/@dhimmel/plagiarism-and-blockchain-timestamping-gone-awry-the-most-interesting-case-of-scientific-irreproducibility</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/timestamping/@dhimmel/plagiarism-and-blockchain-timestamping-gone-awry-the-most-interesting-case-of-scientific-irreproducibility</guid><category><![CDATA[timestamping]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[dhimmel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 22:40:39 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/EEEoA8oLaAxt9jwESGgxgDztD8ki8ztQdPDS7rgNaeuauSRGt8sVef4Fn7WJuCgZcjTUDnjTt6K5HCevDrT9dSTFBntRbR3EHLnoNe6fk2mpB9nnPMTwDhqBPQSHkFBuC5Q9SUGsrTxwywUcTXogi?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>