<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:04:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/filmessay/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Ghostbusters: Afterlife Review | Not too shabby | No spoilers]]></title><description><![CDATA[Kinda funny, no | Image courtesy of Tenor.com? I was never really a fan of the original Ghostbusters. This not because I didn't enjoy it, but rather because I simply was not of that era, it was a time]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/hive-166847/@theul/ghostbusters-afterlife-review-or-not</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/hive-166847/@theul/ghostbusters-afterlife-review-or-not</guid><category><![CDATA[hive-166847]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[theul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/KWcVEiwEzuiBQVV7myhMdxubgsuQSrRcG1nv6xvF9dvJWZSfMzPoNtkxSdrN19N7VR7iqmpMZTXAYAF2NZ?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>