<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 01:24:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/grammartheories/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Grammar study]]></title><description><![CDATA[For those interested in the study of gramar, I let this piece of comment as a chance to enrich it by giving opinions on gramar theories. I can start with Structural Grammar which proposes the study of]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/grammar/@luchar/grammar-study</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/grammar/@luchar/grammar-study</guid><category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[luchar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2018 17:10:18 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://i.ecency.com/p/ADdPNihJzmPaYV4kTz4FprkqDjZi8eRFJAFPfceTEgghVETdPTMbB2xHaJ7kfxbtKDiheQQV2xSiY1df7eUydsrhb?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>