<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 07:19:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/hand-review/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[a profitable shove? [EN/ITA] un'all-in profittevole?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Even fun players would say yes, intuitively. This hand kinda plays itself. But how do we prove it with numbers? Anche per chi gioca a poker per divertimento, la risposta, intuitivamente, sarà si. Questa]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/ita/@bnoise/a-profitable-shove-en-ita-un-all-in-profittevole</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/ita/@bnoise/a-profitable-shove-en-ita-un-all-in-profittevole</guid><category><![CDATA[ita]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[bnoise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:05:48 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/C3TZR1g81UNaPs7vzNXHueW5ZM76DSHWEY7onmfLxcK2iNpR5wG6BerRvHoMd2i8Qm85UEqYdmN7dMS6HE8KoS6xptEupcHdQnieaHwFeuirHbFowR9gzZC?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>