<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 01:37:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/homeplansservice/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[From the vault of archtiecture and design plans- not quite as tiny, mobile or eco friendly as tiny homes today, but still worth a look.]]></title><description><![CDATA[So in the 21st century, we think that tiny house living is a completely new phenomena, but according to these mini magazines from the 1950's and 60's collected by my Mum, tiny house living was a bit of]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/hive-178708/@chocolatescorpi/from-the-vault-of-archtiecture-and-design-plans-not-quite-as-tiny-mobile-or-eco-friendly-as-tiny-homes-today-but-still-worth-a</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/hive-178708/@chocolatescorpi/from-the-vault-of-archtiecture-and-design-plans-not-quite-as-tiny-mobile-or-eco-friendly-as-tiny-homes-today-but-still-worth-a</guid><category><![CDATA[hive-178708]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[chocolatescorpi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 14:46:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/mXkfdToSwHy1F6xC7iNSf4gD4njuiH2TJnH2d9a7sjEgsxpt7CEU4CCxtqXDYokGXYzp6p8iciGehmvGgo6fR2hugrs8Ph6SEwn1mSj34?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>