<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 11:05:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/junpubres/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Journal of Unpublished Results – A case for the validity of scientific research (Part II)]]></title><description><![CDATA[Hello my scientific affiliates and science-skeptics of Steemit,  as I promised in the first part of my article about the reproducibility of valid science, in this second part, I am going to show you]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/science/@replichara/journal-of-unpublished-results-a-case-for-the-validity-of-scientific-research-part-ii</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/science/@replichara/journal-of-unpublished-results-a-case-for-the-validity-of-scientific-research-part-ii</guid><category><![CDATA[science]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[replichara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:58:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://i.ecency.com/p/5CEvyaWxjaEsomB3svPAnLJnqsSN5pyoxXpdPXsiMF2t2FMmSMLRXx6t6rHn9CPQNmqr8Kf2J3HdwtpXg?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>