<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:50:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/lawsociety/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Adverse / perverse incentives of solicitors compensated from legal aid who have entrenched incentives of keeping parties hostile rather than reaching agreement]]></title><description><![CDATA[LEGAL AID It is the working people who pay the bill. We can also argue: "in the best interest of the children" I have reasonable grounds to believe that responsiveness to the email could lead]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/lawsociety/@osdivorce/adverse-perverse-incentives-of-solicitors-compensated-from-legal-aid-who-have-entrenched-incentives-of-keeping-parties-hostile</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/lawsociety/@osdivorce/adverse-perverse-incentives-of-solicitors-compensated-from-legal-aid-who-have-entrenched-incentives-of-keeping-parties-hostile</guid><category><![CDATA[lawsociety]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[osdivorce]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 08:38:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/C3TZR1g81UNaPs7vzNXHueW5ZM76DSHWEY7onmfLxcK2iQRudbvoYwpjUyk3NhJBZqoaqAu3YZsziVqVuW6jcX2wS9dbSkF5psKVUreaYn18bwLDVMHTeCe?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>