<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 03:30:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/localseoguide/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[By Andrew Shotland : Bizarre review schema implementation spotlights gaps between Google’s guidelines & how rich results really work]]></title><description><![CDATA[Google has made its review markup guidelines fairly clear and has even issued penalties to sites that utilize spammy or misleading structured data markup. But columnist Andrew Shotland points out that]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/google/@ceoray/by-andrew-shotland-bizarre-review-schema-implementation-spotlights-gaps-between-google-s-guidelines-and-how-rich-results-really</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/google/@ceoray/by-andrew-shotland-bizarre-review-schema-implementation-spotlights-gaps-between-google-s-guidelines-and-how-rich-results-really</guid><category><![CDATA[google]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[ceoray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:54:39 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/2dk2RRM2dZ8gbkvz1yNBypLpwUHBnasMpK1zSCzdCKAUsAvhmgEwdtFEMGVm7bxG5ctsMm6wJAuRmAC4EwNfZrG76qPH9zYd6weow8QADnJxLf8h9XE2oceatkUVdyKPNMwiXgHwzVoexAMu638iXJuFMh6s4HEi5ETurSKnYE?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>