<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 10:13:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/molekularmanufaktur/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Did a small blockchain startup company just solve a major problem in the academic peer review process?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Academic science runs by rules which are often opaque to outsiders. To understand one of the biggest problems in the academic peer review process, here a short introduction first. If you know about this]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/science/@bbene/did-a-small-blockchain-startup-company-just-solve-a-major-problem-in-the-academic-peer-review-process</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/science/@bbene/did-a-small-blockchain-startup-company-just-solve-a-major-problem-in-the-academic-peer-review-process</guid><category><![CDATA[science]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbene]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2017 21:26:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/YpihifdXP4WTySVi815wTBS1cviU2Mho5Jm3v8vra5s4VA2qgqLZo39R2zCh6xaSmGGbU8whyWariK8vAcpDvu6j5QaJ3z4FLg6JdYPeJ63cmE1WVdgqDVs1Yu1WpC8JuKkCs9foCRofHyfHjgdLZ5PZinqRe5zJ1uRur63T6qYz?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>