<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 10:06:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/naional/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[HOW DOES PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF A “DEEP STATE” IN RELATION TO THE “SPYGATE” CONTROVERSY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY TO PERFORM IT’S PRIMARY MISSION?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Introduction The idea of a “Deep State” is nothing new to students of politics; one of the earliest discussions can be found in Bagehot’s 1867 Theory of Dual Institutions; Glennon (2014) discusses the]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/spying/@stevescoins/how-does-public-perception-of-a-deep-state-in-relation-to-the-spygate-controversy-affect-the-ability-of-the-intelligence</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/spying/@stevescoins/how-does-public-perception-of-a-deep-state-in-relation-to-the-spygate-controversy-affect-the-ability-of-the-intelligence</guid><category><![CDATA[spying]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[stevescoins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2020 16:52:39 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/5bEGgqZEHBMe6s3wiPgGFTi3naqHERgdwJew6rJYRaB3RR7sSAdZKnpNUYEbTd7YDHhCJw7RfmMAwNfPEL3sxv9pm4YifGS2?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>