<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:17:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/oligopsony/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Market Structure (The Video Series) - Oligopsony (Is Steem an oligopsony for content creators?)]]></title><description><![CDATA[Hi Everyone, Welcome to my final video and final post for my market structure series. I am going to wrap everything up with oligopsony. I will also attempt to answer the question of whether content creators]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/dtube/@spectrumecons/mndavhu1</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/dtube/@spectrumecons/mndavhu1</guid><category><![CDATA[dtube]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[spectrumecons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 09:52:27 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/46aP2QbqUqBqwzwxM6L1P6uLNceBDDCM9EbuU5Pu9eYBjHnft7MmNJNKutUXSC6TTJrgWhzexeoLTscTCAHv5XsQrFCg?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market Structure #7 – Oligopsony (Is Steem an oligopsony for content creators?)]]></title><description><![CDATA[Hi Everyone, I am finally posting my last written post in my market structure series. I have taken quite a break from this series. My previous post ‘Market Structure #6 – Monopsony’, was posted just over]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/economics/@spectrumecons/market-structure-7-oligopsony-is-steem-an-oligopsony-for-content-creators</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/economics/@spectrumecons/market-structure-7-oligopsony-is-steem-an-oligopsony-for-content-creators</guid><category><![CDATA[economics]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[spectrumecons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 06:46:15 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/2FFvzA2zeqoVJ2SVhDmmumdPfnVEcahMce9nMwwksSDdRvbEsWhhnXzfEfviPLqDSKJqUAU9JtH4VK8mvpXN4V2bXqCqvbAZzBmuLSwA2U4qiH9RRT5qhnCMs3F6W?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tackling underpaid teachers.]]></title><description><![CDATA[It's widely agreed that teachers in public schools are underpaid. And this is a reasonable view, because the labour market for teachers is an oligopsony -- a market with only a small number of buyers.]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/teachers/@honeybee/tackling-underpaid-teachers</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/teachers/@honeybee/tackling-underpaid-teachers</guid><category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[honeybee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2018 02:31:12 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/C3TZR1g81UNaPs7vzNXHueW5ZM76DSHWEY7onmfLxcK2iNuH5MDMv7ehXyP7wQKrAANVij9nyMmb97yXb5UvbtvzCuuFJvVmgcZSyKXekp3erAdfT7p6VeW?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item><item><title><![CDATA[SYNDICALISM]]></title><description><![CDATA[In order to comprehend the ontological construction below, please refer to the respective posts for all notions in italic. The interaction between the oligopolistic and oligopsonistic practises creates]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/syndicalism/@kaleryd/syndicalism</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/syndicalism/@kaleryd/syndicalism</guid><category><![CDATA[syndicalism]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaleryd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:26:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OLIGOPSONY]]></title><description><![CDATA[In order to comprehend the ontological construction below, please refer to the respective posts for all notions in italic. The fragmented to a couple (two or more) parts monopsonistic demand on the]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/oligopsony/@kaleryd/oligopsony</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/oligopsony/@kaleryd/oligopsony</guid><category><![CDATA[oligopsony]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaleryd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OLIGOPOLISTIC MARKET]]></title><description><![CDATA[In order to comprehend the ontological construction below, please refer to the respective posts for all notions in italic. Divided monopolistic supply and monopolistic demand furnish the oligopolistic]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/oligopolistic/@kaleryd/oligopolistic-market</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/oligopolistic/@kaleryd/oligopolistic-market</guid><category><![CDATA[oligopolistic]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaleryd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:05:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>