<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 18:31:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/oneequalstwo/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[My thougts on 1 == 2; Math theory]]></title><description><![CDATA[As an informatician, I have to deal with maths a lot.  But recently, I got to an interesting problem:  If 0.999... == 1, then why can't we extend this to 0.999...8, and then go down, until 1]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/maths/@linuxer4fun/my-thougts-on-1-2-math-theory</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/maths/@linuxer4fun/my-thougts-on-1-2-math-theory</guid><category><![CDATA[maths]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[linuxer4fun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:08:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>