<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:24:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/phlilosophy/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Argumentation ethics - best proof for libertarianism]]></title><description><![CDATA[Many private-property rights advocates, libertarians and non-libertarians, sadly, stopped searching for the rational basis for the ethical validity of them. All arguments mostly come down to the fact that]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/phlilosophy/@nullpointer/argumentation-ethics-best-proof-for-libertarianism</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/phlilosophy/@nullpointer/argumentation-ethics-best-proof-for-libertarianism</guid><category><![CDATA[phlilosophy]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[nullpointer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2018 19:49:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/LcTxR7u1XKae8Zaj594qUJafNyNSBw9svATPAkZ7gaBhpW5hteNSoDAbAEtCHKJy14DPnMx9pZumxngSvnbDeAZKM58ABrtaXXBcxhTp6Hb8Gqk8hR7GrAVP1TDfx26dGuPa82N7R3xaMDqC2XBFo7zUv?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>