<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 22:01:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/profork/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[  Why Asimov's Laws of Robotics are not good enough and why smart contracts will require human intervention]]></title><description><![CDATA[Human intervention required In one of my previous posts I mentioned the Three Laws of Robotics as one of the reasons why unreliable immutable smart contracts on Ethereum are not safe. In this post I will]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/ethereum/@dana-edwards/why-asimovs-laws-of-robotics-are-not-good-enough-and-why-smart-contracts-will-require</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/ethereum/@dana-edwards/why-asimovs-laws-of-robotics-are-not-good-enough-and-why-smart-contracts-will-require</guid><category><![CDATA[ethereum]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[dana-edwards]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 02:58:24 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://i.ecency.com/p/RGgukq5E6HBSiAzSkyhEAkSC3YAWs8PUjMWejNbjKbQb9PZS5brXRqDNGTySuWxZLE8W6GFuMZ2qh6v2DTuXvqm7Zeoa1TE7KFFPADfFsfEWTVapyecBsopgirXRpfp?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item><item><title><![CDATA[My rational basis for being pro-fork is that to be never-fork or anti-fork has much worse long term potential consequences.]]></title><description><![CDATA[My rational basis for being pro-fork is that to be never-fork or anti-fork has much worse long term potential consequences. Scenario 1) A smart contract is written which cannot be shut down by it's creators,]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/ethereum/@dana-edwards/my-rational-basis-for-being-pro-fork-is-that-to-be-never-fork-or-anti-fork-has</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/ethereum/@dana-edwards/my-rational-basis-for-being-pro-fork-is-that-to-be-never-fork-or-anti-fork-has</guid><category><![CDATA[ethereum]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[dana-edwards]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:50:21 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://i.ecency.com/p/6pu4ZRVQr9H38c2XAF2EUx8HrMy1Qo375CgyyYGRLGFxkJGoSAd9WYaU6ZzFJSemij5X2XSdbkoxVXMu8bUCLpJ6DSeAUrihTvAhmvBeAmuPNYADXibBgYPAJucszZREKbGTEfSQCsx75ZAsyuGPy9ozMLnHmXn9GxJEFFPXeWE2A3cufxYtBuhctsFRcT2AqBTEi?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>