<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 09:30:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/redirects/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[get redirects - AI-driven URL migration tool for SEO professionals]]></title><description><![CDATA[get redirects AI-driven URL migration tool for SEO professionals Screenshots Hunter's comment We Know how importent redirections are,I mean Redirections in Websites such as 301 and 302 This plays importent]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/steemhunt/@kheightces/get-redirects-ai-driven-url-migration-tool-for-seo-professionals</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/steemhunt/@kheightces/get-redirects-ai-driven-url-migration-tool-for-seo-professionals</guid><category><![CDATA[steemhunt]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[kheightces]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 12:14:39 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/2bP4pJr4wVimqCWjYimXJe2cnCgnCetVSPNASpXvis8?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item><item><title><![CDATA[Minimize redirects on gtMetrix]]></title><description><![CDATA[Read the full article here:]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/redirects/@marcodiversi/minimize-redirects-on-gtmetrix</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/redirects/@marcodiversi/minimize-redirects-on-gtmetrix</guid><category><![CDATA[redirects]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[marcodiversi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:29:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/LcTxR7u1XKaa3e4T1EBuBP18JezPvjFFo8gNuE9CiKHBn39WNntNow5uMHT6LM5rtxGMtw26BpXpxMTcw1vM63PLsJchQ8ENNF2nThn6hD7ZpqCqHJpqYwyARZcecg2d7feQdfBTunUiKFeXfP5KVvCxW?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google: 301s & 302s, What is Best For PageRank & Ranking Signals]]></title><description><![CDATA[At State of Search in Dallas last week, I asked Gary Illyes about the issue about 301 versus 302s when it comes to passing PageRank. While Google has said previously that both pass PageRank, there are]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/seo/@usmanmughal/google-301s-and-302s-what-is-best-for-pagerank-and-ranking-signals</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/seo/@usmanmughal/google-301s-and-302s-what-is-best-for-pagerank-and-ranking-signals</guid><category><![CDATA[seo]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[usmanmughal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2017 16:38:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>