<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:39:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/sb8/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Trust your government to regulate reproduction..]]></title><description><![CDATA[I mean, I get the point of the analogies, and they are evocative. But draconian control of reproductive care is something that needs to be owned, so that those who push for it can be held accountable.]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/texas/@arbitration/trust-your-government-to-regulate-reproduction</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/texas/@arbitration/trust-your-government-to-regulate-reproduction</guid><category><![CDATA[texas]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[arbitration]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 22:28:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/8DAuGnTQCLptZgjHUrRAJGcW4y1D4A5QVJJ7zjzqqKdfVHSS6NapSCC5zdHVBsg9fyvrKGyJb4pfKZQXAzmS5Gw71BxYc256NjACKbuWGKMKdEt69bR1Es1HUchBnvxbyE9Qvk1qou64Jr6STB7ynaGMTV9qPLEy3PVh9Dp73bC?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item><item><title><![CDATA[Regarding SCOTUS's recent refusal to issue an injunction in Whole Women's Health v. Jackson.]]></title><description><![CDATA[I am at risk here of making an argument on a complex topic well outside my area of expertise, but will forge on anyway. If anyone with the relevant experience with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/scotus/@arbitration/regarding-scotuss-recent-refusal-to-issue-an-injunction-in-whole-womens-health-v-jackson</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/scotus/@arbitration/regarding-scotuss-recent-refusal-to-issue-an-injunction-in-whole-womens-health-v-jackson</guid><category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[arbitration]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2021 00:02:57 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://images.ecency.com/p/8DAuGnTQCLptZgjHUrRAJGcW4y1D4A5QVJJ7zjzqqKdfVHSS6NapSCC5zdHVBsg9fyvrKGyJb4q253S54gmkdhjAv727v4rfMXmU8kV18fF7xfzK6sPKSL5PL4En5qk9DnLv9tFRUBvgoYV1cftk68vnokJrtwUzPSCVHT119Jn?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>