<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 08:30:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://direct.ecency.com/created/tez0s/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[death grips: to buy tez0s or not - an exchange on the ICO analysis]]></title><description><![CDATA[P. H. Madore at Hacked.com (Hacking Finance) wrote an analysis of the tez0s ICO. He gave it: “his highest safety rating yet: a solid 8.7 on a scale of 0 to 10.” The tez0s ICO is uncapped: “One drawback]]></description><link>http://direct.ecency.com/blockchain/@alexanderchopan/death-grips-to-buy-tez0s-or-not-an-exchange-on-the-ico-analysis</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://direct.ecency.com/blockchain/@alexanderchopan/death-grips-to-buy-tez0s-or-not-an-exchange-on-the-ico-analysis</guid><category><![CDATA[blockchain]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[alexanderchopan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 03:13:09 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>