Instead of bothering to respond you just downvote to try to hide the comment? Nice.

https://media.xpcoin.io/docs/XP-WhitePaper-v3.pdf

Your use of geonodes and its pokemon go-like implementation is in direct contradiction to your pandering to the eco-friendly crowd when you speak about the network's low energy use.

Locations that are difficult to get to and infrequently visited often has to do with the fuel costs required to get there, why would you want to put an incentive on energy intensive tasks like going to the middle of nowhere, or the top of mount Everest in order to get some coins?

Also, your dev node idea has too many problems to even list. What's to prevent anyone from making some crappy "game" that is very bot-friendly, distributing to themselves through dummy accounts?

Any sort of imbalance in the amount of returns on creating a node will simply cause all large investors to create only the most profitable node types, and you have far too many to balance correctly. It seems like some were added as an afterthought as a way to use the phrase "Pentanode" in the marketing.

Decentralized and free from any government control? The concept of requiring "The XP Foundation Mothernode" and a centralized team that's in charge of handling the creation of a few of the node types DIRECTLY contradicts that notion.

According to the exchanges this coin is already dead on arrival, this isn't even worth my time, and anyone dumb enough to buy any deserves to lose their money.