I want to formalize a serious debate about what 
Hive account@adsactly and 
Hive account@dedicatedguy wrote about Venezuelan situation. As we know, the economical and political situation in Venezuela is not in a good moment. But then, i've found some falencies about what Hive account@dedicatedguy must not wrote about. So, at all risks asumed i have made a response about what i think.
In the article, Hive account@dedicatedguy a Venezuelan inmigrant -as i could see- made an unreasonable speech about how the change on Venezuela's Constitution promoted by former president Hugo Chavez, Flag and Shield, perjured the citizens from this affected country. All that only i can say is those have no negative change. Instead, in the new constitution, we have more opportunities than we hadn't before. Before the Chavez age, we were just plebeians ruled by presidents who has no interest by the people. Today we have more participation on a democracy and more freedom of speech as -to be honest- we can do here what we cannot do in other countries. For example...
Turn our flag upside down as protest
In which country could be this legal? Nowere. Just for an example: In the US you gotta be on jail for the long time after turn the american flag upside down. Why? Because is the must anti-patriotic gesticle you could make as protest. Some important Venezuela's celebrities do so in protest against a unexistent regime, and that's the baddes show of love they could do to a country like mine
Not recognizing on the patriotic symbols
This means, not recognizing on the fact about the 8th star put on the Venezuelan flag by Hugo Chavez in 2006, was on honor to the Guayana Province, as Simon Bolivar decreed on November 20th, 1817 while he put the 8th star on the flag of that time. By telling on the Hugo Chavez decision was just a foolish whim is the most ignorant that someone must be, honestly...
Unrecognizing the Constitution when all in it is not in favor of anyone
Let´s be honest, people. The constitution is the most important law of a country. Nobody must violate it at any way. Even if that was changed it must be respected for everything, even President included. But saying that someone is violating the constitution whitout consulting first if that person is doing so is the most idiotness we can do. I say so because in 2017, Maduro has convocated to a National Constituent Assembly by consulting the constitution -from articles 346 to 349-. That is something that the elite considered a violation of a law. However, they were free to convocate to a illegal plesbicit which not supported by the National Electoral Council, which no one knew what was it about, just tree times I DO whitout letting the people know the questions asked to the electors.
Tell me what kind of freedom are violated here in Venezuela because everyone is free to choose. So, Hive account@adsactly and Hive account@dedicatedguy, you are forced to expose and contradict my reasons of which according to you I am wrong in everything I said. And i want all readers take conclussions and make juicy the debate right here
