Maybe it's because the post isn't long enough to explain it, but with all due respect it seems to me that they walk a fine line.

What do I mean? Like those who use continuous banking transactions to disappear a money trail and complicate investigations, passing a text through different IAs who draft, correct, paraphrase and then ask another to do another version of the text and repeat, may not eliminate all traces but complicate the detection of text generated by IAs. There are even untrained detectors that detect translations like this one made by DeepL as AI-generated text, while others once you translate the text are unable to detect it, even if you use a language outside the 5 most common, such as Catalan, Dutch, Italian and do the translation it detects it as AI-generated text because of the words used. So how to measure when yes and when no? At the discretion of the Watcher on duty?

Another thing that I really do not understand and that seems important to me, is that if Hive account@hivewatchers has the ability to detect these people who intentionally took advantage of this to farm rewards, what happens to them? Are there sanctions for those who already did it? Is there a public list so that other communities and curators are aware of the people who perform these practices?, since reading the post it seems that what happened happened and from this moment the alarms are turned on to a situation that has been going on for more than a semester.

All this I want to clarify that it is not an attack, they are doubts that I have after reading the publication and I say this with respect.