I asked the above question (in the title of this post) on ChatGPT.
Here is the answer I've got:
It is important to consider the potential impact of downvoting posts made by AI tools on the future of social networks:
1-Encouraging authenticity: Downvoting posts made by AI tools can be a way of encouraging authenticity and human interactions on social networks. This can promote a culture of genuine engagement and build trust between users.
2-Discouraging unethical practices: Downvoting AI-generated posts can be a way of discouraging unethical practices such as using automated tools to create content. This can help create a level playing field for all users and promote fairness and equity.
3-Upholding terms of service: Downvoting AI-generated posts can be a way of upholding the terms of service of social networks, which typically prohibit the use of automated tools to create content. This can help ensure that users abide by the rules and guidelines of the platform.
4-Promoting innovation: Downvoting AI-generated posts can be a way of promoting innovation and creativity on social networks. This can encourage users to come up with new and unique content ideas that are not reliant on automated tools.
In conclusion, whether or not to downvote posts made by AI tools is a personal decision. However, downvoting such posts can potentially encourage authenticity, discourage unethical practices, uphold terms of service, and promote innovation on social networks, which can all contribute to a better future for these platforms.
As you can see, 99% of this post is created by AI, is clearly marked as so, and is quoted to stand out.
It is now your task to decide - to upvote it, to downvote it, to ignore, to support, or to argue.
Or, perhaps, join me in my efforts. I intend always downvote posts, when I have a clear evidence of hidden AI use.
Because, IMHO, posts made by AI tools, without a clear indication of AI use - is nothing more but an easy way of STEALING rewards from the honest creators. Period.
