Sterlin Luxan, how do you define "peaceful resistance"? To me, resistance implies some form of defensive force. To not use defensive force (or defensive violence, assuming you conflate "violence" with "force" in this case) implies non-resistance (or am I misunderstanding?).
The strategy this article appears to be advocating is "civil disobedience paired with peaceful non-resistance."
Am I misunderstanding you?
RE: Rise of the Lovertarians: A Return to Peaceful Resistance