Well, let me answer a question with a question, is there ever a legitimate government system if there can not be a agreed upon social objectivity?

I am not aware of the encompassing definition of panarchy.

I have thought of the problem of government in several ways, but the one that always tends to arise (outside of centrist view) is that government will be the total dominate social construct, or that that there should be no social construct.

Should people be bound to each other or should people be unbound from each other? If answers vary, you have a problem.